azis, subandiyah (2017) Mudf lowotiliwz owoandud rcs mcwdzsemzucw cr yezou yoszowitoso gsu1ti-9odz yoaulowzow-0w1cwiduo. Mudf lowotiliwz owoandud rcs mcwdzsemzucw cr yezou yoszowitoso gsu1ti-9odz yoaulowzow-0w1cwiduo (7). pp. 1-7.
![[img]](http://eprints.itn.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
1.5011572.pdf Download (469kB) |
Abstract
Abstract. Many sources of risk that may impede the achievement of the project objectives through either cost or quality and time, especially for bridges that have collapsed before, so when the implementation of possible hazard / high hazard so when should the possible hazard/high hazard be implemented The purpose of this research is to identify, to analyze risks by classifying the risks using the method of Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) and managing the dominant risk of execution of the installation work to determine the handling of the steel frame in order to maximize the positive and minimize the incidence of adverse events. The results of this study indicate there are 15 sources of risks are identified, and there are 6 risk indicates the dominant risks. Mitigation performed on the dominant risks unacceptable i.e. Project factor that shows the delays in the arrival of materials due to locations, schedule of the arrival of materials should be tailored to the needs of the field and the amount of material that comes with the required field should also be evaluated. The result is expected to be a guideline for identifying risks and mitigation measures for further research. Subsequent researchers to pay attention on the security factor that implementation time does not affect the productivity of work in construction projects
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Engineering > Civil Engineering |
| Divisions: | Program Pasca Sarjana > Teknik Sipil S2 |
| Depositing User: | haning haning |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Nov 2020 02:15 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2020 02:15 |
| URI: | http://eprints.itn.ac.id/id/eprint/5168 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
